Monday, October 17, 2022

Ivanhoe by Sir Walter Scott

This one has been on my shelf for a long time. How it got there in the first place is a bit strange. Like a lot of titles, I’m sure I picked it up on a whim -- either at a long-ago-forgotten library used book sale or from the dark recesses of some musty old bookshop -- but the whim that possessed me came straight out of my childhood. It had nothing to do with Walter Scott or his Waverly novels (an interesting concept, if I understand it correctly, in which Waverly refers not just to character and place names, but to the tendency of the protagonist to “waver” from one moral position to another in service to the unfolding drama), but instead to a game called Dungeons and Dragons. I played it a lot as a preteen and early teenager, and my best friend at the time named one of his primary characters Ivanhoe, ostensibly after Scott’s work, although I’m a thousand percent sure he never read the novel.

We’ll, now, forty years later, I have. And I found it to be a long and sometimes convoluted tale, with Ivanhoe, or more properly Sir Wilfred of Ivanhoe, cloaked in a false and mysterious identity for most of the novel. Wikipedia provides a nice summary of the novel’s setting:

Ivanhoe is the story of one of the remaining Anglo-Saxon noble families at a time when the nobility in England was overwhelmingly Norman. It follows the Saxon protagonist, Sir Wilfred of Ivanhoe, who is out of favour with his father for his allegiance to the Norman king Richard the Lionheart. The story is set in 1194, after the failure of the Third Crusade, when many of the Crusaders were still returning to their homes in Europe. King Richard, who had been captured by Leopold of Austria on his return journey to England, was believed to still be in captivity.

I frankly wasn’t really interested in any of that. What primarily captured my attention were two other characters, Issac of York and his daughter Rebecca -- both Jews in the decidedly Christian landscape of the novel. They are presented, openly and without irony, not just as foreigners, but in many ways as utter aliens, creatures with motivations and powers that transcend the Christian universe that governs everyone else.

Case in point, late in the novel Rebecca is tried (and convicted) of witchcraft. Her specific crime? Beguiling one of the antagonists, a Templar knight named Brian de Bois-Guilbert, “making” him fall in love with her. 

“There is a spell on me, by Heaven!” said Bois-Guilbert. “I almost think yon besotted skeleton spoke truth, and that the reluctance with which I part from thee hath something in it more than is natural. -- Fair creature!” he said, approaching near her, but with great respect, “so young, so beautiful, so fearless of death! and yet doomed to die, and with infamy and agony. Who would not weep for thee? The tear, that has been a stranger to these eyelids for twenty years, moistens them as I gaze on thee.”

A quick aside, the language here reminds me strongly of a scene in Dumas’s The Three Musketeers, when Athos seeks to comfort the love-stricken heart of his much younger friend D’Artagnan.

D’Artagnan concealed his face in the bosom of Athos, and sobbed aloud.

“Weep,” said Athos, “weep, heart full of love, youth, and life! Alas, would I could weep like you!”

And he drew away his friend, as affectionate as a father, as consoling as a priest, noble as a man who has suffered much.

Possessing a somewhat grizzled old heart myself, I’ve always loved that sentiment and that phraseology. Alas, would I could weep like you!

But what Bois-Guilbert says next is even more interesting to this discussion.

“But it must be; nothing may now save thy life. Thou and I are but the blind instruments of some irresistible fatality, that hurries us along, like goodly vessels driving before the storm, which are dashed against each other, and so perish. Forgive me, then, and let us part at least as friends part. I have assailed thy resolution in vain, and mine own is fixed as the adamantine decrees of fate.”

Fate. It’s a powerful force in the story that is Ivanhoe, but up until now it has largely been presented as a force to be shaped by the Christian will of the actors, not something that shapes them and their actions as Bois-Guilbert seems to confess here. As Rebecca, to her credit, helpfully, and willfully, points out.

“Thus,” said Rebecca, “do men throw on fate the issue of their own wild passions. But I do forgive thee, Bois-Guilbert, though the author of my early death. There are noble things which cross over they powerful mind; but it is the garden of the sluggard, and the weeds have rushed up and conspired to choke the fair and wholesome blossom.”

In many ways, Rebecca is the most interesting character in the novel. As a Jew, she is forced to live outside this society, with her interactions feared and misunderstood by all who encounter her. But in that position, she has the authorial distance to comment most accurately on everything that is happening. If I ever find time to read Ivanhoe again, it is Rebecca’s voice that I’m going to spend most of my efforts listening for.

+ + +

This post first appeared on Eric Lanke's blog, an association executive and author. You can follow him on Twitter @ericlanke or contact him at eric.lanke@gmail.com.




Monday, October 10, 2022

Reflections in Broken Glass: Oates

While I work on editing the final draft of my latest novel, Dragons, I’ve decided to post some works that I had previously only made available for paid download on this blog. What appears below is one of the character sketches I did in support of the main story line in my seventh novel, Columbia.

Columbia is the story of Theodore Lomax, a nineteen-year-old Union solider in the American Civil War, who is as committed as any to the ideal of human freedom. After being assigned to the army of William Tecumseh Sherman, shortly after the general’s infamous March to the Sea, he willingly participates in the destruction of civilian property in Columbia, South Carolina, believing his acts are justified by Southern resistance to the Northern cause of emancipation. But when the destruction escalates into violence against the civilians themselves, he becomes disillusioned, and feels compelled to strike out in opposition to his own countrymen.

The novel is told from Lomax’s point of view, but there are ten other supporting characters, each with a story of his or her own. There was a time when I thought these stories, or these “Reflections in Broken Glass,” should alternate with the chapters in Columbia, presenting a richer but perhaps more tangled tapestry of the lives that painfully converge in the novel’s climactic scenes. But Columbia is clearly a more coherent narrative without them. Still, they were valuable to me as an author, and so I’ve decided to share them here.

“Oates,” centers on the character of David Oates, and describes the life he led before joining the Union Army and his first experience with battle.

___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___


Oates had never been scared before. He thought he had. He guessed everyone thought they had, at one time or another. But early on he discovered there was no such thing as being scared until you were scared like he had been at Shiloh.

He wasn’t even supposed to be there. Not in the thick of it, at least. He had been on detached duty, detached from his own regiment and thrown in with some Illinois farmboys for a reason he had never been able to learn. The first lieutenant had just come up to him that morning and said Oates and about forty other men, two complete companies, had been ordered to fall in with another regiment for some forward maneuvers. That was it. No explanation offered.

Oates had not been in the army long at that time, and he had been actively engaged in the field for almost no time at all. He had volunteered at the mustering office in his hometown of Fond du Lac shortly after the firing on Fort Sumter, but had spent much of his time since then training with other Wisconsin recruits at Camp Randall in Madison. He hadn’t learned until the first winter of the war that he would be part of one of the Wisconsin units slated for duty in the west, and it wasn’t until after the first of the year that he was told he would be serving in a brigade newly formed under the command of one William Tecumseh Sherman. Oates had never even heard the name before, and now, in early April 1862, he had allowed himself to grow somewhat familiar with it, and he realized he still had never actually seen the man other than as a distant figure, usually on horseback. But despite this lack of familiarity with his commanding general, and despite his genuine want of combat experience, Corporal David C. Oates was enough of a soldier to know an order when he heard one, and also to know that orders had to be followed, whether they came with explanations or not.

As expected, after reporting for duty with the Illinois colonel, Oates and the other men from his regiment were taken forward, farther than any of them had ever been taken before. They marched for what seemed like an hour through the Union camp, past countless other regiments, some of whom were forming for what would soon be their own advances, others who seemed sprawled out on the earth as if they had already done all the work they were ever going to do. Although Oates had not made many friends in the army, as they continued to move forward he glanced around at the faces of his comrades and saw the same look of fear and uncertainty he knew had to adorn his own. Seeing so many others who seemed to be in the same position as he, who were suddenly being forced to wrestle with their own frightful inexperience, it gave Oates a small measure of the confidence he needed to keep himself moving forward.

When they were finally brought to a halt, it was in a lightly wooded area atop a small rise overlooking a long plain. Oates and the others who had marched with him looked out across that plain and saw there were no other Union troops ahead of them. There weren’t any enemy soldiers at that time, either. There wasn’t anything out on the plain, it seemed, except for a small white-washed chapel, but that didn’t matter. The absence of any friendly forces meant only one thing to those anxious young men. They were the front. In the battle that was to come, the battle that they had been brought forward to fight, they had been chosen to stand on the front line and receive the first salvos of the enemy.

It was a frightening proposition, and there wasn’t a man in that strengthened brigade who did not feel the significance of it pressing down on him like a great stone weight that had reached the point in its clockwork descent which forced him to crouch beneath its looming shadow. But in truth, none of them had been selected to comprise the forward salient of the Union Army, and as the worrisome minutes ticked by, each man who had seen the weight lower to within the immediacy of his concerns saw it rise again to a safer and less troubling distance as other regiments in blue were marched into positions out in the field before him.

That is when the Illinois colonel turned to his captains, the captains subsequently turned to their lieutenants, and the lieutenants finally turned to their soldiers and privates, and revealed what the general (not their general, the one commanding their brigade, but the general, the one commanding the entire army, the newly-nicknamed Unconditional Surrender Grant) had decided would be their role in the forthcoming battle.

“Okay, boys,” began the second lieutenant through whose words Oates and the other Wisconsin soldiers heard Grant’s wisdom and strategy, “listen up and listen good. The Rebs, they’re all massed up behind those trees on the other side of these fields. They’ve been forming for an attack since early this morning, since before most of you boys were even up. They’re hoping to hit us before Buell gets here. Any minute now, they’re going to pop out from between those trees and launch themselves against us. Those boys out ahead of us, they’re going to take the first hit, but we need to be ready because it’s our job to fill any holes the Rebs are able to punch in our line. We’re what the textbooks call the reserves, and we’re going to be ordered forward by the company, by the regiment, or by the brigade as needed to throw back any Rebs that are slippery enough to sneak through our front. You boys have got to be ready to move at a moment’s notice. Keep your eyes on me and, when the time comes, do exactly what I tell you and do it quick. Understand?”

“Yes, sir,” the voices echoed in unison around Oates.

Oates did not know if his voice had been included with those of the others. He had felt the words sound within him, he had felt the strength of his desire to measure up to the orders placed before him and to perform them in a manner exceeding the expectations of he who issued them, but he could not tell if he had been able to express those sentiments in the manner prescribed by the United States Army. He could not tell if he had been able to speak. At the time his mouth was too dry to know if it was even part of his face.

In the short time he waited for the Confederates to make their appearance on what would soon become a battlefield, Oates found his mind filled with thoughts about the home and family he had left behind in order to be positioned like a chess piece in the place he now stood. He was a young man, twenty-three years old, with a wife named Sarah and two small boys: Richard, named after his father, and Parker, named after Sarah’s. He missed them terribly, as he knew he would, but both he and Sarah had thought it important that they offer some sacrifice in the national crisis facing the country which had given them so much.

America, they knew, was a place like no other on earth, where men could live and worship as they chose. It was primarily the freedom of religion clause in the American Bill of Rights that had convinced Oates’s great-grandfather to emigrate here in 1792, and from that time forward, as four generations of his family moved westward from New York to Ohio to Wisconsin, they enjoyed the ability to openly worship their Creator as they saw fit, without any of the censure or interference they would have encountered in any other country around the world. Their community, while small, was tightly knit and wholly committed to the truths as they read them in their Bibles, truths that seemed all too clear to them but which had seemed to elude the leaders of so many other organized religions. Oates had known Sarah since they had been children, their families attending the same church in Fond du Lac, and as they each had grown into adulthood, the feelings of love that connected them intensified not only out of their own desires but also very much out of the bond that connected each of them with the great and benevolent God that guided all their actions. They had been married in the same church they had attended as children, a church they now brought their own children to every Sunday, and whose Bible they were already teaching their young boys to read. Their religion was so much a part of who they were and the lives they led that they could scarcely conceive of what they would be without it. Having the freedom to practice and abide by his own beliefs and not by the beliefs of some foreign power or national government had enabled Oates to develop into what he viewed as a more complete human being. It had allowed him to become more than he would have ever thought possible. He was the head of a loving, faithful family and a member of a devout, respected community. At the current stage of his life, he knew he had no right to ask for anything more.

When the opportunity came for him to lend his small might to the struggle facing the nation that had made all that possible, there had been no way for Oates to refuse. Sarah had understood that. Although terribly afraid of losing him, she had supported him in his decision to join the army, knowing in a way she did not fully understand that the war just beginning in secluded corners of their country was more than just an isolated fight between a group of hardened secessionists and the entrenched forces of the Federal government. Sarah knew that the impending battle was one in which everyone needed to take sides. It was a conflagration that would one day engulf them all, and those that had not aligned themselves with one philosophy or the other would find themselves in the open fire, unprotected by the balms offered by either side.

“Where do you think they’ll send you?” she had asked him in the darkness of their bedroom the night before he intended to leave.

“I don’t know,” he had told her quietly. “To Madison, first, I suppose. They say they’re training regiments there for service in the West. Maybe I’ll go there.”

“The West?” she had said, her voice heavy in the still air beside him.

“Yes. Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi. There’s talk of trying to wrest the whole of the river away from their forces. But perhaps not. Men are needed in the East, too.”

“So you think they might send you there?” Sarah had asked.

“I don't know, Sarah,” Oates had replied gently, knowing she often looked to him for answers to the questions that mystified her in other areas of their life. Sometimes, he thought, she looked to him as if he was some kind of prophet, as if he had the ability to see into the future, even though the answers he gave to her questions were wrong just as often as they were right.

“The boys will miss you, David.”

Sarah’s words had come quietly after a silent pause, spoken almost as if they were unfamiliar to her, as if she was trying to make herself understood in a foreign language.

Oates had sighed softly to himself, his open eyes staring blankly into the darkness above their bed.

“Richard understands what I’m doing and what has to be done,” he had said as gently as he could. “And you’ll explain it to Parker when he’s old enough to understand.”

“You don’t think you’ll be gone that long, do you?” his wife had asked nervously. “Can’t you explain it to him yourself when you return.”

His initial words of response had caught in his throat, unable to escape the tight constriction that seemed to seize him. The words were reflective of thoughts he had had for weeks now, thoughts that had almost seemed to plague him since it first became clear he had a decision to make, that the progression of events outside his small life had forced upon him a choice between allegiance to his family and allegiance to his nation. They were thoughts Sarah had undoubtedly experienced herself, that he may not return from the places the war would send him, but they were thoughts neither husband nor wife had dared to voice to the other, choosing instead to keep them bottled up within themselves, in the place where fears too horrible to imagine were stowed. Even as Oates had lain in bed beside Sarah on their final night together, he could not imagine voicing those four little words which had come to command such unbelievable power over them and their lives. To think them was one thing. Thinking them was easy. I may not return. He had thought them almost constantly since making his choice and they had not yet convinced him to forsake the principles of his country for the convenience of those he loved and who loved him. But to say them was something entirely different. To give them voice, to open them for discussion and speculation; that was a liberty he did not wish them to have. As silent thoughts, Oates was firm in his ability to wrestle them under his control. But as vocalizations, spoken aloud and hurled at him from without as well as within, he feared their capacity to overwhelm him, to beat him down into a position from which he could no longer raise himself.

So Oates had forced those words back down within himself, wondering obliquely as he did so how much of the future he really could see. “I will,” he had answered Sarah fearfully. “I will explain everything to Parker when I return.”

When the Rebels first came bounding out of the trees on the far side of the field, Oates had a difficult time seeing them. His line of sight was largely blocked by the Union troops that had been deployed along their front. Indeed, his first indication that the Confederates had made their appearance was the booming of the Federal cannon that went off up and down their line. The sound had a strange effect on Oates. It was not the first time he had heard the firing of cannon, but it was, he realized, the first time he had been this close to them when they were being fired against their enemy. The explosions and the whistling of the shells had a strange tenor to them, almost as if the projectiles they were using were different from the ones they had used before, as if they were special and more deadly artillery shells, used for the first time in combat against the gathered forces of the enemy. The cannons went off in succession, one after the other down the long line of Federal troops, each team of artillerymen descending on their cannon as soon as it had been fired, struggling to get it loaded and primed for another shot at the advancing Confederates. To Oates’s untrained eye it seemed the epitome of military instruction and precision. Each man performing a single task for which he had been specifically trained, each man acting in synchronization with the other members of his team, and the six of them together achieving the desired end—turning a cold hunk of iron into a hot and flaming weapon of destruction. The team Oates watched worked feverishly to get their cannon loaded again, stood only momentarily aside as it was fired, and then swooped back in to start the process all over again.

The Federal cannon fired continuously like that for perhaps ten minutes, the distinct booming of each individual piece quickly blending themselves into an almost constant roar, thundering in the ears of every man present on the field. To Oates the awful noise seemed to drown out every other sound in the universe except for the quickened beating of his own heart, which he could hear thumping away in his chest like a frightened animal, held fast in a woodsman’s trap but struggling desperately to find some means of escape. Then, without warning or any signal Oates could observe, the firing stopped. The thunder gone, the ringing in his ears the only reminder Oates had that it had ever even existed, silence reigned on the battlefield for a few seconds as he and countless other soldiers peered uselessly forward into billows of smoke the cannon had created, seeking some sign of either the enemy or the destruction they had caused. From his position in the reserves, at least, Oates couldn’t gain an indication of either. The smoke was just too thick.

Then there was a sudden movement across the Federal line in front of them. Up and down its entire length, it seemed, men were rising from crouched positions in the wild grass, men with rifles already held in firing position, all aiming forward into the field before them, all pointing their weapons blindly into the swirling smoke that surrounded them. The men were spaced evenly in groups of forty or so between the cannon, and to the right of each company, an officer stood with his sword held high in the air. In the quiet that existed before those officers began giving the orders to fire, Oates could hear a distant and sporadic popping sound, something, he thought, not unlike the sound of the last few kernels of corn popping in the pan over the evening fire. Wondering briefly what the sound could be, he saw one of the riflemen who had risen with such precision twitch and topple over backward as though he had been physically struck. Even at his distance from the front line, Oates could see the blood that stained the man’s uniform, and he realized with an unexpected kind of dread that the man had been shot. The enemy was out there, all right. They could not yet be seen, but they were out there and they were firing back.

Suddenly, the Union officers up and down the line shouted their commands to fire, swiping their raised swords down in a violent fashion, and thousands of rifles went off, the popping noise they created sounding more like a shower of marbles falling on a tin roof, and adding their own smoky discharge to the clouds that obscured the ranks. The men who fired the weapons, like the artillerymen before them, immediately dropped to one knee to reload their rifles, but fewer than a fourth of them had risen to take their second shot when the unexpected and, to Oates’s way of thinking, unbelievable happened. Rebel soldiers, some dressed in uniforms of gray or butternut, others in the simple dress of farmers or laborers, appeared suddenly out of the rolling smoke, each with a bayonet fixed on the end of his rifle and all of them already on top of the unprepared Union soldiers.

There’s so many of them, Oates thought unconsciously, disbelieving the numbers he saw with his own eyes. They came out of the smoke in a literal swarm, whooping and yelping like maddened demons, charging forward up and down the length of the Federal line and enveloping it with thousands more around each flank. There seemed to be so many that at first Oates thought their cannon and rifle fire must have missed them all, that not a single one of them could have been hit in their trek across the open field. Realizing how impossible that was, Oates however found himself faced with the even more horrifying possibility that the Confederates so outnumbered them that even the casualties they must have inflicted with their artillery barrage had not been enough to slow their advance. 

“Line up!” the second lieutenant who had spoken to them before suddenly shouted and Oates instinctively came forward with the other Wisconsin troops to form a line with the rest of the Illinois regiment. Their rifles were already loaded. They had been ordered to load them while they had waited for the Confederates to come up. But now that the Rebels were less than a hundred yards away, Oates felt an almost overwhelming need to load his rifle again. One shot was not going to be enough. Oates could see that already. Like the men on the line ahead of them, the best of them would be able to get off no more than two shots before the Rebels were on top of them. He wished desperately for a weapon that could take more than one cartridge at a time, for a revolver or some mystical rifle he could load with hundreds of shots and keep firing all day long.

“Aim steady, boys!” the second lieutenant shouted beside them. “Wait till you get a clear shot. Make it count. Then forget about a second one. Fix your bayonets and wait for my signal to charge.”

In the rush of events around him, the lieutenant’s words contained far too much information for Oates to fully comprehend. He focused on the first three words and had enough presence of mind to recognize the wisdom they contained. Up ahead of him, Rebels were already streaming through the Union line. Many were engaged hand-to-hand with the Federals, the Union men using their rifles as clubs and their officers slashing viciously with their swords, but many more seemed to stumble easily through the defenders, finding themselves unchallenged in the open spaces between the Federal line and their reserves. There, they took only a moment to orient themselves and then renewed their charge towards Oates and the rest of Sherman’s brigade.

The moment then came for Oates, the moment he had thought about since they had first placed a rifle in his hands, since they had first taught him how to load and fire it. In the heat of that moment, he found himself unconsciously falling almost wholly back on that instruction. Not unlike the drilled and practiced actions of the men who had armed and fired the cannon before him, Oates now selected a solitary target out of the advancing forces, placed the center of its chest in the sights of his rifle, and, whispering a short prayer to God to forgive him, slowly squeezed the trigger. As chaotic as everything seemed around him, there was a calm and rational place within Oates that knew his target was a human being and that, by his actions, Oates would be killing him.

The bullet struck the man a little high of where Oates had been aiming. As Oates watched, still through the sights of his rifle, he saw a red cloud of the man’s blood explode outward from the base of his throat, his head rocking backward with the impact as he dropped lifelessly to the ground and lay unmoving on the earth, no more than fifty yards from where Oates sat clutching his rifle. There had been no sound. In the moments following the act, Oates found himself terrified with the idea that such a thing could happen without any noise or flourish of any kind. In all the rush and activity of battle, the sound of his victim dying had been so completely masked that it was as if he had made no sound at all, a man dying suddenly and unnoticed amidst the charge and screams of ten thousand others. A man surely not too unlike Oates himself, with a home and family somewhere, a family who prayed for him and waited hopefully for his return. Examining the episode in his mind, an exercise Oates at that time had no idea he would find himself repeating for years to come, he could not even be sure if he had heard the sound of his own rifle going off in his hands.

“Bayonets!” the second lieutenant screamed beside them, knocking Oates momentarily out of his introspection. Suddenly, the endless drilling they had forced upon him at Camp Randall took over again and he mechanically removed his bayonet from its holding clip and attached it to the mount on the end of his rifle. The weapon now transformed from a firearm to a pike, Oates remained crouched in the scrub grass with the rest of the regiment, waiting for the order to charge. The Confederates were still advancing, many more than Oates would have thought possible. He had killed one, and so had many others in the regiment, but like the cannon and rifle fire sent forward from their front line, they seemed to have had little effect on the overall advance of the enemy. The Rebels were descending upon them in great numbers, more than Oates had the ability to count in the seconds before the forces collided, and as he watched them draw ever nearer, bayonets fixed like his own and lowered for the attack, Oates could see by the looks on their faces they were each in their own minds selecting a single target, each picking an individual Union soldier in the line before them to try and skewer with their bayonets. One had chosen Oates, a short and squat little man with an angry face.

“Charge!”

The command came at the last possible moment and was all but superfluous in Oates’s mind. In a state of near total fear, Oates saw his only hope to avoid impalement was to leap up and stab his attacker first. There was no military training or instruction underlying this realization; it was rather his own survival instinct guiding him now. Oblivious to the actions of those around him or to the orders of the company commander, Oates ran forward, his rifle desperately thrust forward, and closed the remaining few yards between him and the Confederate soldier.

The impact was unlike anything Oates had ever experienced before. His bayonet caught the man on his left side, snagging briefly on one of his ribs before the momentum of the collision forced it past the bone and sank it deeply into the man’s upper abdomen, so deep that the entire blade and first few inches of his rifle barrel went completely through him and poked out through his back. The Rebel’s bayonet was deflected upward in the collision, passing harmlessly over Oates’s right shoulder, but the speed of his advance carried him forward, pushing Oates’s rifle out of his sweaty grip and knocking him over backwards. His attacker fell on top of him, the butt of Oates’s rifle planting itself firmly on the ground beneath him and forcing its barrel through the man’s body up to the trigger guard. As he dropped on top of Oates, the man’s blood came pouring out of him in a flood, covering Oates in haphazard splashes from his chin to his crotch.

Oates lay there silently for a moment, the body of the Confederate soldier briefly protecting him from additional attacks. The man’s dead weight pressed down on him heavily—his blood seeping deeply into Oates’s clothing and pressing them wet and sticky against his flesh—but the man was not himself dead, the soft moans he breathed humidly into Oates’s ear clear evidence of his continued state of consciousness. Horrified with what had just occurred and with the accidental intimacy of their contact, Oates roughly threw the man off, rolling him over onto his back and gasped desperately for breath through a throat constricted with sudden panic.

The battle raged furiously all around him. Oates found himself thrust back into the land of the living on the very edge of terror. The line he and his comrades had formed in anticipation of the Rebel approach was all but gone, Union and Confederate troops struggling against each other in every direction he looked. Still visibly outnumbered by the enemy, two Rebel soldiers came rushing toward him, bayonets lowered and thrust forward in an attempt to pin him to the ground beside their fallen compatriot. Instinctively knowing that the process of removing his own weapon from the body of his victim would take more time than he had available, Oates scrambled desperately for the Rebel’s rifle, snatching it from his feeble grasp and pointing it blindly towards his new adversaries just as they descended on him.

Oates caught one of them in the face, the bayonet stabbing him just below the left eye, and causing his own thrust to go wide, his blade gouging harmlessly into the earth beside Oates. The other would have surely injured if not killed Oates had it not been for the unexpected appearance of another Union soldier, who clubbed the Confederate viciously on the back of his head with the butt of his rifle, cracking the Rebel’s skull open and dropping him suddenly on top of the man Oates had previously impaled. The man with the face wound stumbled blindly into this Union soldier’s path and the larger man delivered a similar blow to the top of his head. Oates watched as the impact forced blood to spray out of the man’s ears and he crumpled lifeless to the ground at Oates’s feet.

Dear God, Oates thought simply, momentarily overcome with the horror of what he had just seen. It wouldn’t be until long after the battle ended that he would come to realize how relieved he had been to see that particular man killed, how thankful he had felt for this unknown stranger who had miraculously saved his life.

“Ha, ha!” the large and somewhat grizzled Union soldier shouted wildly, stepping over the dead man at his feet to offer Oates his hand. “A little too close for comfort, eh?”

Oates nodded his head quickly in response. In the howl of activity that surrounded him, he wasn’t at all sure what the other man had said to him.

William Floyd shook his hand before the younger man’s face like a country preacher calling down the wrath of God, trying to catch his attention and show him he meant to help him to his feet. “Come on!” he shouted almost joyfully at Oates. “Take my hand. There’s plenty more where these bastards came from!”

Understanding crept slowly into Oates. He grasped Floyd’s hand and was pulled enthusiastically to his feet. The events that transpired over the next several hours comprised a trial and hardship unlike any Oates had ever faced before. Shouting, cursing, struggling, bespattered with blood and grime, Oates fought, initially at the side of the man who had saved his life, at later times as part of an improvised phalanx of Union soldiers, and often, whenever the whim and flow of battle dictated, completely on his own. He fought against whatever opponents presented themselves to him, fought them blindly and without precision, the way men do in saloons when they’ve had too much to drink. He fought them with blade, with club, with fist, and with teeth. He fought them any way he could because even to his untrained mind, Oates knew to fight was to stay alive. He knew that fighting with everything he had was the only way to pass through the battle and come out intact on the other side. The passage would not leave him clean, he allowed himself no delusions of that. This baptism of battle washing over him would not leave him or anyone else it touched clean. It was sure to leave him hungry and scarred in ways Oates had never dreamed of before. But it would leave him alive.

To detail every single event, every solitary sensation Oates experienced during that time would be impossible, even for Oates himself, who came out of the conflagration with little more than the memory of a constant roar of adrenaline and terror, feeding continually on itself until it seemed to consume him totally. Oates necessarily allowed himself—the part that was truly himself, his soul, Oates would have said—to drift away from the actions his body performed, to shield himself from the horrors that surrounded him, until the nightmare ended and he could allow himself to drop back down into awareness. In this state, Oates acted as little more than an automaton, as no more than a soldier, lashing out at any figure that seemed to threaten him, at times unconsciously attacking friend and foe alike, stabbing, smashing, or clawing them until they retreated or dropped out of their threatening poses, and then striking out at the next.

There was only one moment in that long and exhausting afternoon when Oates found himself thrust back in command of his own senses, painfully and singularly aware of himself and his position in the hell around him. A Confederate bayonet caught him wildly in the meat of his right thigh, slipping into him like fire and tearing its way out like a burst of lightning. It brought Oates immediately out of his stupor and he was suddenly himself again. For the first time in hours, he felt his heart pounding away in his chest, his blood rushing through his veins, blood now spilling fresh and hot down the inside of his trousers, and the air rushing in and out of his lungs as he struggled to draw enough sustenance from it to sustain him. In that instant he was no longer just a soldier, he was David C. Oates again—David Charles Oates, a tool maker and child of God from Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, with a plain-featured wife named Sarah and two small boys named after their grandfathers—and there had never been a moment in his life when he wanted more than anything else to stay alive.

Mercifully, the moment passed. Even as Oates turned to attack the Rebel who had stabbed him, the moment passed, his instinct for survival forcing him back into his shell, protecting him from the feelings and sensations threatening to overwhelm him and leave him in the clutches of the fear and chaos that surrounded him. The Confederate who had wounded him had actually been fleeing from a group of six Union soldiers, his gaze turned back over his shoulder to watch their advance and his bayonet bouncing erratically from side to side as he ran. The man was past him and gone before Oates could do anything in retaliation, likely unaware that he had even drawn Yankee blood. No matter. There were other Rebel soldiers advancing from many sides. Pressing the loose flap of his torn trousers against the wound, the sticky blood holding it as a ready-made bandage after a few moments of pressure, Oates turned to grapple with the closest one, dropping deeply back into his intuitive and already hardened battle trance.

Their generals and officers tried their best to direct their efforts, shoring up defenses, launching counter attacks, executing flank movements, but for Oates and the men around him in the very crucible of the battle, their voices were unheard and the strategies they offered were useless. From Oates’s detached and troubled point of view, there seemed to be no organized movement anywhere near him, ally and enemy alike flying in and out from every direction, exactly like a group of hornets swarming around their nest under the eave of some country barn.

Eventually, it ended. With no concept of how many had been killed or how much ground had been given or taken, the roaring fury around Oates quieted and abruptly stopped. Oates found himself facing no more opponents. The Confederates he could still see were moving far out in the field before him, retreating sedately back to the protections of their own entrenchments as the sky above them darkened, not just with the coming of night but also with the approach of storm clouds. Flashes of lightning could already be seen, long echoes of thunder pealing out after each brilliant bolt, sights and sounds that must have been with them for some time but which had gone all but unnoticed in the tempest of battle. The only other Rebels to be found were those laying on the ground all around him, most of them dead but some with wounds so severe they were unable to drag themselves after their retreating comrades. The struggle finally over, Oates experienced two collapses. The first was physical; his body giving in to the exhaustion it had been ignoring for hours and dropping thankfully to the ground. The second was mental, as the wall Oates had built up between himself and the ugliness of battle vanished, and his full sense of awareness came crashing down from the lofty tower in which it had been chained.

His leg hurt. That was his first sensation. His leg hurt in a way he had never felt before, an intense kind of throbbing that seemed to match his racing heartbeat, each thump causing the pain in his thigh to flare up like a fire after receiving fresh fuel. Oates looked down at it and saw the entire leg of his trousers was saturated with blood. There was a tear in the fabric, about midway between his hip and his knee, and that seemed to be where the blood had come from, although it looked now as if it had stopped. Oates snaked his hand down along the ground to the injury and gently grasped an edge of the torn fabric. He had to see what had been done to him. It suddenly seemed like the most important thing in the world. He tentatively began to pull the torn fabric away from the wound, but the dried blood held it tightly against his body. Without thinking, Oates pulled harder and it suddenly came free, tearing itself out of the wound with an audible crackling and sending a terrific bolt of pain directly from the injury up into his brain.

The blood started to flow almost immediately, seeping out of his leg in a startling quantity, reminding Oates of water rising up around his boots when walking on muddy ground. He clamped the loose trouser fabric over it roughly, giving himself another shot of pain, and pressed it tightly against the flow, praying he hadn’t started something he couldn’t stop. He forced himself to look away, tilting his head back and closing his eyes tightly. He could feel the thick, warm liquid pooling up between his fingers.

Please God, Oates thought silently. Please let it stop. I won’t look at it again. I don’t want to look at it anymore. Just make it stop bleeding. There’s so much blood, I can’t have much left in me. Please make it stop bleeding before it’s too late.

Oates felt dizzy and light-headed, the ground seeming to revolve beneath him as his body turned in the other direction. He put the back of his free hand against his sweaty forehead and began to shake helplessly with fear. He did not want to die. It was a simple desire, not unlike wanting a cold glass of milk or a warm fire on a Sunday night, but he felt it at an intensity beyond anything he had ever felt before. He wanted to see Sarah again. Sarah and Richard and Parker. Dear God in heaven above, he wanted to see them all again. He had promised to tell Parker all about why he had to leave. He had said it in the darkness to his wife in order to ward off the larger fear they shared, but it was still a promise he meant to keep. He did not want to die out here, alone in some strange field. He didn’t even know where he was.

As he lay there praying to his God to spare his life, filling his mind with images of his home and family as if the very images had the power to sustain him, Oates began to hear noises around him, noises apart from the thunder which still boomed occasionally over his head, noises detected first on the very edge of his awareness, but slowly growing in both their volume and frequency. They were strange noises, unfamiliar to his ears yet compelling at the same time. They crept into the center of his attention like wild dogs stalking their prey, and when Oates was finally able to make room for them between his desire to be reunited with his family and his fear for his own life, wild dogs is what he thought they were, wild dogs crying with the approach of night.

“Sarah,” a voice sounded plaintively beside him, dragging the name out with mournful emotion.

Oates opened his eyes. The sky above him was nearly full dark now, but Oates turned his gaze away from its comforting blackness, rolling his head to the left. Laying there on his side, not ten feet away from him, was a Confederate soldier, a stab wound bleeding freely from his stomach and the top part of his skull split open, steam escaping out into the cool night air.

“Sarah,” the soldier whispered repeatedly, the faltering syllables growing softer and softer, his eyes already glazed over with the vacant stare of death.

He’s calling out for his wife, Oates realized with hollow satisfaction. His wife or some other beloved. Her name is Sarah and he’s thinking about her as he dies.

The strange noises all around him suddenly crystallized into perfect clarity and he knew exactly what they were. All over the field men were dying and each of them, in their own moments of solitude, were crying out in one fashion or the other. Some, like the man next to him, were crying out for their wives or girlfriends, others were crying out for their mothers or other loved ones, others simply for water, or for someone to come and finish them, and some were crying out in pain, not forming any specific words, just crying for the sake of their own agony and sorrow. Oates heard them all, each of them singularly and as part of the whole, meshing together into a rare kind of murmur, something, Oates supposed, heard only on battlefields or during times of plague. The sound of thousands of men dying.

Lightning flashed high above Oates, and as the thunder sounded and the rain began to fall, he turned his head to look out into the field before him, where the Union line had stood before the battle began, and where the Confederates had marched across in order to engage them. In the darkness Oates could just make out the shape of the small white chapel he had seen earlier, now a black and featureless shape. The field itself seemed to be undulating in places, the ground rising and falling in isolated areas as if a brigade of gophers were burrowing their way across it just under the surface. Another burst of lightning filled the sky above him, allowing Oates to see that the ground was not in fact moving, but that it was covered with moving shapes. Some of the shapes were men, to be sure, men from one side or the other whose wounds would only permit them to crawl slowly back to the safety of their own lines, but far more of the shapes were clearly not men at all. They were too large to be men dragging themselves along the ground, too large and too round, moving about on stumpy little legs.

Hogs, the rational part of Oates’s mind was able to supply for him. That’s what they are. They’re hogs. Hogs feeding on the ungathered dead.

+ + +

“Oates” is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of the author's imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.

This post first appeared on Eric Lanke's blog, an association executive and author. You can follow him on Twitter @ericlanke or contact him at eric.lanke@gmail.com.

Image Source

https://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/shermans-march

Monday, October 3, 2022

A Bright Shining Lie by Neil Sheehan

There are several interesting parts to this massive work of biography and history. The subtitle here is “John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam,” and that well captures the dual focus of this work -- at once a history of America’s involvement in Vietnam and a biography of John Paul Vann.

Vann was a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army who served two tours in Vietnam, the first as an Army officer and the second, after his military retirement, as a civilian administrator. In Sheehan’s narrative, it is largely through Vann’s eyes that we see Vietnam -- a perspective that both changes over time and which reflects the general perspective of America and its administrators.

We’ll Show Them How Strong and Tough We Are

In the beginning, Vann is idealistic, and serving only as a kind of advisor to the South Vietnamese military, who is fighting both the North Vietnamese “Viet Cong” and a peasant class of South Vietnamese sympathizers and potential sympathizers.

John Vann had come to Vietnam to wage war on other men, not on their mothers and fathers or on their wives and children. That these people were relatives of guerrillas, and undoubtedly did sympathize with the Viet Cong and helped them, did not strip them of their noncombatant status and make them fair game in his mind. Rather, they were people whom the Saigon government ought to be seeking to win over by fair treatment so that they would talk their sons and husbands into deserting the Communist ranks.

And he is appalled by the perspectives and tactics of his South Vietnamese allies.

[Major General Huynh Van] Cao and the other Saigon officers, Vann concluded, wanted to kill these people and destroy their homes and slaughter their livestock, not on a systematic basis, but often enough to intimidate them. Their theory of pacification apparently was to terrorize the peasants out of supporting the Viet Cong. For this reason Cao and the province and district chiefs also did nothing to stop the torture and murder. They thought it useful. Their attitude was: “We’ll teach these people a lesson. We’ll show them how strong and tough we are.” The only coherent reply he could ever get out of Cao when they argued about the air strikes and shellings was that the planes and the artillery flaunted the power of the government and made the population respect it. Vann had also been puzzled at first as to why Cao and most of his fellow Saigon officers did not feel any guilt over this butchery and sadism. He had come to see that they regarded the peasantry as some sort of subspecies. They were not taking human life and destroying human homes. They were exterminating treacherous animals and stamping out their dens.

We’ll show them how strong and tough we are. Flaunting our power will make these people respect us. They’re not human; they’re animals. Vann (and America), while at first horrified by these perspectives will, of course, come to embrace them all. 

An Inevitable Tragedy of the War

Much of the indiscriminate killing of Vietnamese civilians came through the air strikes and bombings orchestrated by a combined Vietnamese-American air force, commanded by Brigadier General Rollen “Buck” Anthis. Through his commanding officer, Colonel Daniel Boone Porter, Vann complained again and again to General Anthis, and frequently invited him out into the field to see the tragic results of his strikes.

Anthis reacted with irritation to the first invitation and with increased hostility each time Porter renewed it. They went round and round over the same arguments. Well, perhaps some innocent people were getting hurt, but this was an inevitable tragedy of the war, Anthis would concede in the time-tested “War is hell” theme. It was not a question of some noncombatants, it was a question of mostly noncombatants, and this was not an ordinary war, Porter would counter. Porter had to be exaggerating, Anthis would say; the commander of the VNAF and the ARVN officers he met told him that most of the casualties were guerrillas and that the bombing was hurting the Communists a great deal. He was being deceived, Porter would tell Anthis, and try to set him straight with the latest report from Vann on how the bombing was driving “these people right into the arms of the Viet Cong.” Anthis would refuse to accept the possibility that his bombs could be a boon to the Communists. Porter would challenge again, if Anthis wasn’t afraid of the truth, why didn’t he come down and see for himself who his planes were hitting? Anthis would fall back on a legal argument. He and his people didn’t initiate any of the bombings. The air strikes were all conducted at the request of the country’s legal authorities -- the responsible ARVN officer and the province and district chiefs.

It’s an old and familiar story, one that tragically unfolds in war after war. The exercise of might from a safe distance does not make potentially neutral civilians respect the exercisers of that might. Far from it, it invariably has the opposite effect, making the civilians more resistant and building their allegiance with the enemy. In my most recent experience, it is exactly like the thinking and approach described in Scahill’s Dirty Wars, there not in 1960’s Vietnam, but in 2000’s Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yemen.

But there is an even deeper and more systemic issue at work here.

[Vann] understood what Porter was up against with Anthis. Every service wanted as big a role as possible in Vietnam as soon as Kennedy committed the United States to the war. The more the Air Force bombed, the bigger its role. If air power was restricted the way it ought to be, the Air Force would not have much to do in Vietnam. It was in Anthis’s personal interest and the interest of his institution to believe that the bombing furthered the war effort, and so he believed it. Letting himself be confronted with the corpses of women and children would inhibit his ability to bomb with enthusiasm. Vann did not blame the Air Force for being the institutional creature it was. The fault lay with [overall war commander General Paul] Harkins for not grasping the nature of the war and curbing institutional proclivities.

This is one of the central lessons of war -- something every commander should learn and heed. The bureaucracy makes decisions based on what is good for it, not necessarily for the war aims or effort. In reading these passages, I am reminded of the stories of the political Civil War generals, all in-fighting amongst themselves as they jockeyed for command of larger and larger units.

The Imagery of the American Revolution

A big part of America’s handicap in Vietnam was its picking the wrong side to fight with and for. And here, we’re not talking about the South versus the North Vietnamese, but even more tragically, the two sides vying for control of South Vietnam.

Some of the people put in charge, people like Air Force General Edward Lansdale, couldn’t help themselves. Lansdale had a successful clandestine career in the Philippines (he would eventually work for the CIA), where he helped the local Filipinos fight against insurgent Communist forces -- and he tried to cut and paste those same tactics and strategies onto Vietnam. But it didn’t work, because in Vietnam, the “American” revolutionaries were not fighting the Communists in North Vietnam. They were fighting America’s puppet regime led by Ngo Dinh Diem.

When Diem told Lansdale that he had resisted the French and spoke of his abhorrence of godless Communism, Lansdale let his preconceptions lead him to false assumptions, as Vann was later to do with Cao. He also thought it was perfectly all right for a Vietnamese leader to be publicly supported by the United States and to associate with high ranking Americans. After all, he had just come from an Asian country in which the secretary of defense had shared a house in the American military compound with a CIA agent and had lost none of his political integrity as a result. Lansdale thought the Catholic refugees from the North were Vietnamese patriots who had “fought for their country’s freedom from the French” until they discovered that they were being hoodwinked in a Communist conspiracy and so were fleeing south to “Free Vietnam” to create a new life of liberty there. Haiphong in the final months of their evacuation was “reminiscent of our own pioneer days,” he said in a secret report. He saw nothing wrong with the United States singling out these Catholics for special assistance. He saw nothing inappropriate about having a Catholic as president of what he perceived to be a “Free Vietnam.”

Are you following this? Lansdale is viewing the installed Catholic president Diem and the Catholic refugees from the North through a glass darkly tinted with his inbred tropes of the American revolution. But…

Roman Catholics were a tainted minority in Vietnam. Lansdale was anxious to draw a distinction between Americans and French “colonialists.” What he did was to make the distinction one without a difference. His actions were now being seen in the perspective of Vietnamese, not Filipino, history. By singling out the Catholics for help, and by putting a Catholic in office in Saigon, he announced that the United States was stepping in to replace the French. Vietnamese converts to Catholicism had been used by the French as a fifth column to penetrate precolonial Vietnam and then had been rewarded by the colonizer for their collaboration. They were popularly regarded as a foreign-inspired, “un-Vietnamese” religious sect. With the French leaving, the Catholics were naturally seeking another foreign protector. They told Lansdale what they sensed he wanted to hear.

Prior to what Americans think of as “the Vietnam War,” the country of Vietnam had been partially colonized by the French, and thousands of native Vietnamese, including Ho Chi Minh, had fought a guerilla war for years, which eventually succeeded in throwing off that oppression. The Catholics had been the collaborators with the French in those days, and now the Americans were here, putting those very collaborators into power. Including, of course, Ngo Dinh Diem.

Ngo Dinh Diem did not believe in representative government, although he had learned enough about Americans during two and a half years of exile in the United States to give Lansdale the impression that he did. He was also not interested in social justice. He did not want to alter the traditional Vietnamese social structure that the French had preserved in desiccated form. Diem was a fervent reactionary, intent on founding a new family dynasty in a country where most other thinking people thought that dynasties were anachronisms. There had once been a Ngo dynasty, a brief one, in the tenth century. Diem saw himself heading a second one to replace the Nguyen dynasty that had been discredited by the degenerate [Emperor and French colonial vassal] Bao Dai. His family would help him to rule in the traditional dynastic manner. His concession to modernity would be to call himself a president. Diem’s quarrel with the French had been an angry but narrow one, and what dimmed claim to nationalist credentials he once held was besmirched the moment he became Bao Dai’s prime minister. At that moment Diem inherited Bao Dai’s quisling administration and the Vietnamese element of the French colonial army, police, and civil bureaucracy, and he let the Americans make him their surrogate. The attitude that held in the Philippines held in reverse in Vietnam. It was not patriotic in Vietnam to collaborate with the Americans. To many Vietnamese, the Americans stood for colonialism, oppression, and social injustice.

And yet this is the regime that Americans like Lansdale and Vann (and Kennedy and Nixon) saw as on the side of truth and justice. Almost everyone has seen the horrific photograph of the buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc self-immolating himself on the streets of 1963 Saigon. What is often not remembered is that he did it as an act of protest against the oppressive regime of Ngo Dinh Diem and his American masters. But too many Americans, then and now, were blinded by their own mythical narrative to see these realities.

With so much of the imagery of the American Revolution in his head, Lansdale could not imagine that he could join the wrong side or become the wrong side in an Asian country in the midst of its national revolution. The strength of their American ideology also made it impossible for men like [Foreign Service Officer Everet] Bumgardner and Vann to accept this possibility. Yet this was precisely what had happened in Vietnam. There was a national revolution going on in Vietnam, and the United States was not part of it. America had first joined the wrong side by equipping and financing the French in their venture to reimpose colonial rule. America was now becoming the wrong side by moving directly into Vietnam to install Diem and his family as the representatives of its power.

Ungodly, Subhuman, Beastly, Sneaky, and Treacherous

And then there was the racism. Anti-Asian racism that had been sharpened to a razor-barbed point during the second World War.

Hopeful Asians who looked to the United States for protection also did not understand that American attitudes toward them were influenced by a racism so profound that Americans usually did not realize they were applying a racist double standard in Asia. The lyrics of the World War II ditty sung on the assembly line of America had been:

“Whistle while you work
Hitler is a jerk
Mussolini is a weenie,
But the Japs are worse.”

The Japs were not worse; the Germans were. The Germans were the dangerous and fiendish enemy. Japan never possessed the military potential to threaten the existence of the United States; Germany did. The urgency behind the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb came from the realization of the American and emigre European scientists that Hitler might be ahead in a race to construct these “superbombs” with which to give the United States and Britain the choice of surrender or annihilation. Japan’s World War II technological capacity was so limited that its navy was forced to fight blind at night and in bad weather because the development of radar, let alone nuclear weapons, was beyond Japanese wartime science and industry. In contrast to the satanic planning and efficiency with which the Nazis used the facilities of an industrialized society to liquidate 12 million persons in the concentration camps (6 million Jews and an equal number of non-Jews from the occupied countries), the Japanese atrocities, however barbarous and cruel, were haphazard.

It is amazing that Americans would fear and hate the Japanese to such a larger degree than the Germans given these simple facts. 

The market-research pollsters in the Treasury Department discovered that advertising that relied on racist hate propaganda against the Japanese sold more war bonds than anti-German  hatemongering. Their polls showed that the average American viewed Japanese as “ungodly, subhuman, beastly, sneaky, and treacherous.” The war-bond drives therefore concentrated on toothy “Nips.” The FBI arrested some of the more prominent American Nazis in the Bund. Otherwise, German-Americans were not disturbed, except for the heckling of neighborhood children.

For Japanese-Americans, of course, there were other, much more disturbing measures taken.

After Pearl Harbor there was a wave of hysterical rumors in California and other West Coast states, encouraged by the press and the Army, that Japanese-Americans were signaling submarines, sending secret radio transmissions to invasion fleets, caching arms, and drawing maps with which to guide the Nipponese hordes after they landed. An attempt to organize a program of voluntary resettlement inland failed because no one would have the Japanese. The reply of the governor of Idaho was typical: “The Japs live like rats, breed like rats, and act like rats. We don’t want them.” The Army rounded up more than 110,000 Japanese-Americans in the spring of 1942, 60,000 of whom were U.S. citizens by birth, and herded them into concentration camps in barren and arid federal reservations in the West. The governor of California tried to have them employed on their way to the camps as menial agricultural labor. The Supreme Court approved what had since been recognized as the greatest violation of civil liberties in the history of the Republic.

It is against this racist history and understanding of history that decisions were made with regard to Vietnam that would most likely not have been made if the Vietnamese had been white Europeans. Indeed, in many ways, it seemed like decisions regarding how to treat Vietnam went against the stated strategic objectives of the American world power that emerged after World War II.

Truman’s high-minded warning in his October 1945 Navy Day speech that the United States would refuse to “recognize any government imposed on any nation by the force of any foreign power” -- the twelve-point Wilsonian declaration that had encouraged Ho [Chi Minh] to appeal to him for protection against the French -- showed that the racist double standard of the American stateman had not changed since Wilson’s time. Truman’s words were directed at the Soviet Union for imposing its rule on the white nations of Eastern Europe. There is no indication he was disturbed by the atrocities the French had been committing for a month in their campaign to reconquer the Saigon region and the Mekong Delta. Nor is there any evidence that he or anyone else in a senior position in the U.S. government became seriously upset about the greater atrocities in Haiphong, which the French were to commit during their subsequent campaign in the North.

Better Dead than Red

The policy of the United States, despite Wilson’s and Truman’s words, was not to disavow any government imposed upon a nation by the force of a foreign power. If it was, the United States would never have chosen sides in Vietnam at all. No, the policy of the United States, stated or otherwise, was to stop the spread of Communism. And in this regard…

The emergence of Communists at the head of the Vietnamese Revolution gave the leaders of the United States a conscience-salving reason to do in Vietnam what Washington had intended to do there in any case. The men in Washington swiftly forgot the original circumstances and told themselves, to justify inflicting on the Vietnamese the sufferings of a war that was to endure for seven and half more years, that they were preventing the spread of Soviet (soon to be Sino-Soviet) imperialism in Southeast Asia. Succeeding generations of American statesmen, who never examined the past because they too were so certain of what they wanted to do, were to tell themselves the same thing.

This mindset against Communism would become all-consuming. Long after it became clear -- even to Vann -- that the toll in human lives and human misery that they were tallying was worse than life under even the most totalitarian Communist regime -- the war had to continue to be fought.

The war had reached the point, they agreed, where only blind men could claim that continuing it indefinitely was in the interest of the Vietnamese. As bad as a Communist Vietnam would be -- and Vann and his friends envisioned it as a place of Maoist agricultural communes where even martial sex would be state-supervised -- it would be a lesser evil than torturing these peasants with endless war.

This is an absolutely essential point, and one that I have rarely come across in all of my reading. Communism and War are both bad, we are told. But when, if ever, is War worse than Communism? Should we be prepared to do anything -- literally anything -- to keep people from living (in some cases voluntarily) under Communism?

One incident in particular stood out for Vann and [Foreign Service Officer Douglas] Ramsey. It occurred at the end of April, on the afternoon of the day the Ranger company was overrun at So Do. A young peasant woman and her two children and two of her friends and their children were cutting sugar cane in a field about a mile away. VNAF and U.S. Air Force fighter-bombers had been called out, as they invariably were after such debacles by the Saigon side, and were over the area with spotter planes looking for the long-gone guerrillas. Two fighter-bombers made a pass over the sugar cane field. To try to indicate that they were not Viet Cong, the woman and her friends and the children did not run. The planes made several more passes and the women and their children kept cutting cane, hoping that their innocence would be recognized. On the next pass the planes dropped napalm. The young woman was the only survivor of the eight in the field. Vann and Ramsey found out what had happened when she walked into Bau Trai for treatment at the dispensary and they questioned her. Both her arms were burned so badly they were going to have to be amputated. She would never be able to close her eyes to sleep again because her eyelids had been scorched away. She was eight months pregnant with another child, but she was not going to be able to nurse her baby. The nipples of her breasts had been burned off.

Well, at least that woman wasn’t forced to live under Communism!

John’s "Sexual" Compulsion

One of the things that surprised me about the biography part of this work is how unflinching it is. Vann’s narcissistic side is on display here, although, when it first emerges on page 474, I have to say it took me a little by surprise.

John’s resentment at being forced to leave the war would pass, [his wife] Mary Jane felt, but there was something else between them that time did not seem to change, despite their physical attachment. It was John’s sexual compulsion. She had learned of it before he left for Korea. It was another of the unsettling discoveries she had made in the house on the hill. He was making love to the two Japanese housemaids. At first she was outraged that he would betray her and magnify the indignity by doing so in her home. Then she became fearful because she thought that if she confronted him openly, it might destroy their marriage, and every action she took to show her disapproval silently only brought firmer resistance from him. The maids, who were sixteen to eighteen years old, could hardly refuse him, with jobs and food so scarce for Japanese in 1949-50. She nevertheless decided to fire the maid he seemed most actively involved with and hoped that he would get the message. He ignored it and took up with the new maid she hired. When Mary Jane fired her and did not replace her, he hired another second maid himself without informing her. She could tell that he had selected this latest girl and brought her into the house in order to make love to her. When Mary Jane fired this girl too, he got still another. His activity with the maids did not seem to affect his ability or desire to make love to her. It seemed that John had plenty of sexual energy to spare. Mary Jane had remained silent, but for the first time in their marriage there had been tension between them. He made it clear that he was going to have his harem and that he expected her to accept his behavior. He showed no sign of guilt.

This seemed so far out of left field that I actually wrote in the margin next to that paragraph: “Out of the blue -- but deeply relevant -- will it be mentioned again?” Turns out, it is mentioned again -- extensively. Initially, it is told from Mary Jane’s point of view -- a 1950s wife and mother of three children, trapped by her circumstances and the expectations of her social class.

Mary Jane refused to consider the possibility of leaving him. Raising three children on what she could expect to earn as an unskilled woman intimidated her, and she regarded divorce as a public admission to her parents and friends that she had failed at the one enterprise in life at which she most wanted to succeed. She told herself that she would not be able to bear the shame of it. She could not even bring herself to take revenge by having an affair.

If he had given her the semblance of the marriage she wanted, she might have learned to accept his promiscuity. She would plead with him to come home for dinner after classes on a given evening. He would promise and she would cook a special meal, put candles on the table, buy some wine -- everything just for the two of them and the expectation of making love afterward -- and he would fail to show up. She would be hysterical by the time he did return well after midnight, railing at him in tears that she was his wife, that he had taken marriage vows, that it was his duty to come to her. One evening he promised to return early to eat with her and the children because it was [their daughter] Patricia’s birthday. Mary Jane baked a cake. Midnight came and went without Patricia’s father coming home. Patricia remembered her birthday cake sitting on the table uncut, the candles unlit, and her mother lying on her parents’ bed sobbing uncontrollably.

But even through this lens, Vann’s selfish pathology shines through. It is central to understanding who he was and what drove him to do the things that he had done -- both in Vietnam and in his marriage. Why is he this way? There is one piece to his backstory that provides some level of explanation, a piece that he eventually does share with Mary Jane.

During earlier and happier years of the marriage, John had told her more about his childhood than he was ever to tell anyone. He had told her that he was illegitimate and had taken her to meet Johnny Spry [Vann’s biological father] during a stopover in Norfolk in 1947 on their first trip to Fort Benning. She was struck by his resemblance to his natural father and listened to him reminisce about riding on kegs of bootleg whiskey as a little boy when Spry had taken him along on delivery runs before Spry’s still had been raided. She heard how Mollie [Vann’s aunt, his mother’s sister] had rescued him from the crib in which his mother had abandoned him, of Frank Vann’s [Vann’s stepfather] perpetual fried potatoes and biscuits, of how Garland Hopkins [Vann’s childhood minister] had given him an escape by sending him to Ferrum [a military prep school and junior college]. They had driven over to Ferrum so that he could show her the school and introduce her to his teachers. At the time Myrtle [Vann’s mother] had taken up with a chief petty officer in the Navy for whom she was soon to leave Frank Vann. Mary Jane had gathered from what John said of his mother that she was altogether egocentric, a drinker and a loose woman who had rejected him and her other children. His first memory of his mother, he had said, was of her sitting in front of her dresser brushing her hair.

But there are deeper and darker pieces to his backstory, pieces which Vann kept hidden from everyone, including his wife. Pieces that filled him with the conscious shame that he had to struggle and fight to overcome.

For every fragment of his childhood John revealed to her, he concealed many more. He was too ashamed of the memories to speak of them even to her, or he suppressed them. At this unhappy time in her marriage she had no way of knowing why John behaved as he did. She had no way of understanding the magnitude of the insecurity that Myrtle had created in him. The boy who had to prove to himself that he had the courage of a male by feats of daring was the man who had to keep assuring himself of his masculinity by a never-ending marathon of seduction. What was a penchant for womanizing in Spry was a hunger that no number of women could satisfy in John. Using women to give himself fleeting assurance was also not enough for him. He had to victimize women too, as he was victimizing Mary Jane in a kind of revenge on his mother.

And then there are those pieces that Vann likely kept hidden even from himself.

He also had not told her that Garland Hopkins was another man with a dark side and that Hopkins had exacted a price for liberating him. Hopkins’s tragic flaw was pedophilia, a homosexual attraction to boys. Hopkins did not recite ghost stories around the campfire simply to entertain his Boy Scouts. He would pick out a boy who had been frightened by his tales and crawl into the boy’s sleeping bag later that night saying that he wanted to comfort him. Hopkins’s particular compulsion did not involve sodomy or other advanced acts of homosexuality. It was the fondling of the genitals that little boys commonly engage in with each other as sex play. (He had a normal relationship with his wife and fathered three children.) Men like Hopkins are most attracted to the blond-slip-of-a-youth sort that Vann was at fourteen. There is no doubt there was a relationship between them. It is not unusual in such cases for the sexual relationship to end as the boy grows older and for the two men to wind up being friends. This is apparently what happened in the case of Vann and Hopkins. Vann admired Hopkins’s qualities as a social reformer and political activist and was immensely grateful to him. The relationship does seem to have aggravated the insecurity that Myrtle created, making Vann even more ferociously heterosexual.

It is a sad and painful tale -- one that make me wonder, as I have frequently wondered when encountering anecdotes like this, how prevalent sexual abuse is in our repressed society -- and to what degree that abuse accounts for the dysfunction of the adults who are supposedly the keepers of that society. You know, the kind of people willing to incinerate Vietnamese peasants in the name of fighting Communism. In a previous investigation, I found an estimate that one in ten people are sexually abused as children and that, clinically, those who are abused as children often grow into adults who abuse children. 

In this context, some of Sheehan’s take on the “relationship” between Vann and Hopkins seem a little subdued. There’s plenty of characterizations above that should be questioned, if not outright disputed. Pedophilia is a “tragic flaw”? A grown man fondling the genitals of young boys is akin to the sex play that “little boys commonly engage in”? The relationship made Vann “even more ferociously heterosexual”? There is a myopia here that may be a product of Sheehan’s time and place, even as he presents clear evidence that many others did not view things in the same subdued way.

Vann had a cruel encounter with his youth just before he left [for his second tour in Vietnam]. While in Washington in February and March for three weeks of processing and orientation lectures at AID headquarters, he stayed with Garland Hopkins at Hopkins’s house in the Virginia suburb of McLean. Hopkins had been destroyed by his pedophilia. The CIA had fired him as head of the American Friends of the Middle East, the pro-Arab lobby that he had built and that the CIA secretly funded. He had then been dismissed as pastor of a prominent church in Arlington and also removed from the Virginia Conference of Methodist ministers, in which his father and grandfather had held honored places. His wife had divorced him because he had taken to beating her and their youngest son under the stress of his disgrace. He still could not control his obsession and molested some boys in the neighborhood. The parents complained to the police, and this time he was going to be prosecuted. He could not bear the shame. He wrote out his will and an obituary listing his accomplishments. He also wrote a note to Vann, and then he took a rat poison containing strychnine, inflicting a painful death on himself -- strychnine kills with convulsions. Vann found Hopkins’s body when he returned to the house on a Sunday night. The note asked Vann to distribute the obituary to the newspapers, listed family members and friends for Vann to notify, and also asked him to see to it that Hopkins’s body was cremated. Vann called the police and then did as his boyhood mentor asked. “Let these few chores be a last token of our long and splendid friendship,” the note said. The horror of it made Vann more eager than ever to be gone.

Horror seems the appropriate word. According to statistics, Hopkins was likely a victim himself -- likely abused as a boy -- but he was still a monster, in his last moments more focused on his “accomplishments” than the (dozens of? hundreds of?) boys he traumatized. And Vann, a victim himself -- of Hopkins, of Myrtle, of Vietnam -- was in this moment “more eager than ever to be gone.” But gone from what? Most likely from the thing he couldn’t escape. From himself.

+ + +

This post first appeared on Eric Lanke's blog, an association executive and author. You can follow him on Twitter @ericlanke or contact him at eric.lanke@gmail.com.




Monday, September 26, 2022

Dragons - Chapter 97 (DRAFT)

When I look back on everything now -- and I mean everything that happened, from that first meeting I got pulled into to fire Amy Crawford to the meeting I orchestrated to tender my own resignation and everything in between -- it is still the look on Mary’s face when I told her I was quitting that I remember most vividly. She literally looked like I had clocked her with a two by four. Although we have never spoken about it, I remained convinced that she had absolutely no idea that I was thinking about leaving her organization.

How could that be? I used to think that Mary was some kind of strategic savant -- playing a hundred different angles, pulling a hundred different strings, ensuring that everything and everyone around her was manipulated to whatever degree was necessary to pull off her diabolical schemes. And all of that in order to aggregate power and prestige for her over-inflated ego. What was happening to me inside her company was being done by design. It was calculated. Directed. For nefarious purposes. 

But after that last meeting with her, and seeing the way she looked back at me like a bombed-out orphan, I began to question that assumption. It caused me to re-evaluate everything that I had been through, and I began to understand that none of it -- none of it at all -- had had any kind of directed plan behind it. Mary, like everyone else in this long and painful story, was a victim of her circumstance, turning from one crisis to the next not out of fealty to any set agenda, but simply on the same base survival instinct that drove us all.

Over the next two weeks I came back to the office only a handful of times -- once to collect those books that belonged to me and to better organize the files I would leave behind on my computer, and another time for a kind of awkward exit interview with Peggy Wilcox, the head of human resources. Truth be told, Peggy did most of the talking in that interview, expressing again and again how sorry she was to see me go, once even drawing from a box of tissues to wipe away her own tears.

I had prepared for the discussion, a page full of notes in front of me, detailing out all the things I thought were broken inside the company, and even ready to offer a few constructive suggestions for how to repair them, but I wasn’t able to get even halfway down the page, and I don’t think Peggy really understood anything I did manage to say. Like everything else inside that company, their procedures for collecting actionable intelligence from departing staff members were half-assed, seat-of-the-pants affairs. We do these things because we’re supposed to, not because we understand what value they might actually have for us and our organization.

Oddly, I thought, I received some phone calls from some of the volunteers I had worked with. Three, in fact. The first from Eleanor Rumford, the second from Paul Webster, and the third from Wes Howard. Eleanor and Paul were professional and somewhat defential, obviously fishing for information about why I was leaving and what was really going on inside the company, but professional enough to wish me well and to ask about my health and that of my family before launching into the real reasons for their calls. I rebuffed them the best I could. A better opportunity. If memory serves, that was pretty much my matra. A better opportunity had been offered to me, one I would be a fool not to accept, and I wished them and the organization the best of all possible successes.

But Wes Howard was a different story.

“What the fuck do you think you’re doing, Alan?”

“Excuse me?”

“You’re leaving? I don’t remember telling you that you could leave.”

He was insane. I distinctly remember that thought coming into my mind as he dropped those words on me, sounding exactly like a schoolyard bully who was still trying to exert his domination over the basketball court. 

“Wes,” I said calmly. “I’ve resigned. I’ve accepted a new position. I’m moving on.”

“The fuck you are. I’ve still got that dirt on you -- about you and your romps with Mrs. Bethany Bishop. You are going to do exactly what I fucking tell you to do, or I’m going to rain that information down all over your happy little marriage.”

“Good-bye, Wes.”

“Don’t test me, Alan. Don’t you fucking test me!”

“Good-bye, Wes. Give my best to Amy.”

I hung up and immediately told my cell phone to block his number. Whether he ever tried to call me again, I don’t know, but I never spoke to him again and, as far as I know, he never made good on his threat to go public with his imaginary dirt about me and Bethany. In a way I had never fully realized before, I saw then that Wes Howard was far more afraid of the world around him than I was and, that, as long as I understood that as the source of his chaos, I could never possibly feel trapped by him again. I pitied him. 

And through all these ups and downs, our new baby -- who we decided to name Eliana -- grew steadily stronger until she was first released from the NICU and then from the hospital altogether. Her total stay there was a little over four weeks, long enough for me to exit my old job completely and to start working remotely for the new one. Just as he had promised, Steve Anderson offered all the flexibility he could, with his assistant Julie going above and beyond to lend support and, eventually, to help us find permanent residence in one of the most agreeable suburbs of Boston. 

Over those four weeks Jenny also recovered, slowly but steadily, from her c-section, but I saw her infrequently as she spent most of her days and all of her nights at the hospital to be near Eliana and to feed her with the mother’s milk that the baby had eventually learned to draw out of Jenny’s breast. During that time, Meredith also left us, going back to her own world, and I found myself living for several weeks more or less alone with Jacob, serving as his primary caregiver in between conference calls and spreadsheets. We spent a lot of time together, interacting in ways we mostly hadn’t before.

One colossal project we had decided on together was a kind of banner, anticipating the day we would welcome the baby Eliana home from the hospital. Using the computer and printer, I created a series of giant block letters, each one filling an entire page of copy paper, and capable of spelling out “WELCOME HOME ELIANA!” and Jacob spent a tremendous amount of time carefully coloring and decorating each with crayons and stickers and glitter glue. When they were finished, we strung them together with wrapping paper ribbon and hung the whole contraption with two anchors made of wads of transparent tape from the mantle in the living room.

I remember sitting there with Jacob standing between my legs, the two of us admiring the successful completion of a project that had been days in the making. Throughout, Jacob had shown both the perfectionism that was typical of him and a strange kind of happy persistence that was not. If he didn’t like the way one of his decorations turned out, he had simply asked me to reprint it, and we would then work together on the new one, him welcoming my input and participation. Like his train sets and his hidden picture books, he seemed absolutely absorbed in these tasks, but nothing seemed to set him back. Everything, every action, good or bad, he took as but one step in a journey that led inevitably to our shared destination. As I sat there, smelling the shampoo I had recently rubbed in his hair, I told him that I loved him. That I loved him as much as I could love anyone in the world.

“Daddy?” he said.

“Yeah, buddy?”

“When is Mommy coming home?”

THE END

+ + +

“Dragons” is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of the author's imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental. For more information, go here.

This post first appeared on Eric Lanke's blog, an association executive and author. You can follow him on Twitter @ericlanke or contact him at eric.lanke@gmail.com.

Image Source

http://lres.com/heres-why-amcs-need-to-pay-close-attention-to-looming-regulatory-changes/businessman-in-the-middle-of-a-labyrinth/


Monday, September 19, 2022

How Would a Patriot Act? by Glenn Greenwald

It’s curious how this book came up in my reading rotation right after The Imperial Presidency by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. That was not planned, but the two works are kind of companion pieces to one another -- Schlesinger writing about the increasing imperial powers of the presidency throughout U.S. history and up to the Nixon administration, and Greenwald picking up the same theme relative to the George W. Bush administration.

There are really just two points that I find worth commenting on relative to Greenwald’s work -- and neither of them have to do with George W. Bush specifically. The first has to do with the question of patriotism -- and about how no one political party has any particular claim to its mantle.

The extremist theories that have taken hold in the executive branch for the last five years have nothing to do with liberal or conservative political ideology, nor do they have anything to do with being a Democrat or Republican. Rather, they are an outright betrayal of American values regarding government.

We are a nation of laws, where the people make the law. Our elected officials do not rule over us; they are our public servants. We cannot be imprisoned without charges and we have a right to be judged by a jury of our peers. Thus, when we enact legal restrictions through our Congress on what our government can do to us as citizens (as we did with FISA, or the ban on torture), those laws bind all citizens, including our elected officials.

Those are the values to which any American patriot, by definition, subscribes. Contrary to the central deceit manufactured by Bush defenders over the last five years, patriotism is not defined by loyalty to a particular elected official or political party. Indeed, excess loyalty to a single individual or party is the very antithesis of patriotism, as it places fealty to that individual or party over allegiance to the country, its interests, and its values. True patriotism is measured by the extent to which one believes in, and is willing to fight for and defend, the defining values and core principles of our country.

Seems kind of important to remember in these troubled times.

Second, with regard to the oft-maligned slow pace of the political process and government action, Greenwald would call our attention to this quote by Justice Brandeis:

The doctrine of the separation of powers was adopted by the Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, [343 U.S. 579, 614] by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy.

Efficiency often means autocracy -- or at least the exercise of arbitrary power -- a warning that those who call obsessively for it should certainly heed.

+ + +

This post first appeared on Eric Lanke's blog, an association executive and author. You can follow him on Twitter @ericlanke or contact him at eric.lanke@gmail.com.